Reconstructed following an Israeli demolition operation : Israeli Occupation Forces verbally notify Khirbet Ein Al-Rash-ash of demolition again
- Violation: demolition threat
- Location: Ein Al-Rash-ash hamlet- Nablus governorate
- Date: March 06, 2016
- Perpetrators: Planning and Construction Committee- Israel Civil Administration
- Victims: 12 Bedouin families (82 members)
Details:
The hamlet of Al-Rash-ash , southeast Duma village in Nablus , witnessed on March 06, 2016 intensive raids by Israeli Occupation Forces and Israel Civil Administration. The forces took photos of the area ,documented everything related to hamlet such like tents barns and residential structures and verbally informed 13 families of eviction on the claim that the area is "closed military zone"
It should be marked that the forces based the issuance of the verbal order on the decision of Israel Supreme Court made on January 2016, stating the eviction of Ein Al-Rash-ash community .
Photos 1-3: view of the threatened community of Ein Al-Rash-ash
It should be marked that the community of Ein Al-Rash-ash was entirely demolished on February 15, 2016, rendering 13 families (82 members) homeless. For further information, please read the full report issued by Land Research Center (Link).
On January 28, 2016, the residents of Ein Al-Rash-ash community were served an eviction order after their plea to Israel Supreme Court was rejected. For further information, please read the full report issued by Land Research Center (Link)
With no infrastructure and electricity, the Bedouins of Al-Kaa'bnah and Al-Zawahrah have been residing the area known as Ain Al-Rash-ash, south Nablus city for over 30years. Living in houses made by hey and metal slaps, most of Al-Kaa'bnah Bedouins were born there developing a unique bondage with the land, valleys and mountain
During the year of 2015, the residents of the community were served Stop-Work orders on structures. Despite legal follow-up through Nablus governorate, the occupation served same residents demolition orders with a three day objection period . The case was then discussed in Israel Supreme Court, which ruled for the favor of the occupation and demolition.
Prepared by
The Land Research Center
LRC
